Copyright © 2026 Michael Herman (Bindloss, Alberta, Canada) – Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Public License
PART 0 — Introduction
This document delivers three outputs based on the analysis of 37 papers from The Digital Economist (TDE) website’s 2026 whitepaper collection:
1. A visualizable strategic framework
2. A board-level briefing
3. A mapping of all 37 papers into a common analytical grid
PART I — The Strategic Framework
The Five Orthogonal Axes
The entire collection can be located in a five-dimensional space:
- Agency — Who acts? Humans, institutions, AI systems, or hybrids.
- Governance — Who decides? Centralized authority, distributed coordination, or emergent norms.
- Value — What counts as success? Efficiency vs resilience, profit vs regeneration, growth vs sustainability.
- Inclusion — Who benefits? Elites vs societies, Global North vs Global South, firms vs communities.
- Trust — Why believe the system works? Institutions, technical verification, ethics, or culture.
These axes form a minimal spanning set. Every paper in the collection is a projection onto this space.
Visual Framework
Imagine a pentagon:
- Each vertex is one axis: Agency, Governance, Value, Inclusion, Trust.
- Each paper plots as a shape inside the pentagon.
- The collection as a whole forms a dense center: a governance-first, trust-dependent, inclusion-sensitive vision of AI-enabled society.
This is the operating system model of the portfolio.
PART II — Board-Level Briefing
Executive Brief
This is not a technology agenda. It is an institutional transformation for the AI era.
The collection asserts that:
- AI is becoming an economic and organizational actor, not merely a tool.
- Digital systems are becoming de facto governance structures.
- Markets now form moral architectures, shaping inclusion and exclusion.
- Trust is the binding constraint on scale.
Strategic Implications for Leadership
- From adoption to redesign: The question is no longer “How do we use AI?” but “What institutions must change because AI exists?”
- From control to coordination: Centralized governance models cannot keep pace with agentic systems, decentralized finance, and cross-border data flows.
- From ESG as reporting to ESG as an operating system: Sustainability and ethics move from compliance to core strategy.
- From globalization to pluralism: The future is not one system but interoperable systems with shared principles.
Risks Identified Across the Collection
- Legitimacy collapses if AI scales faster than governance
- Inequality amplification through uneven access
- Institutional hollowing as automation replaces discretion
- Trust erosion through opaque systems
Strategic Opportunities
- Positioning governance as a competitive advantage
- Designing trust as infrastructure
- Treating inclusion as growth strategy
- Using decentralization pragmatically, not ideologically
PART III — Mapping the 37 Papers
Legend: Primary axis = main contribution; Secondary = strong supporting theme.
| # | Paper (short title) | Primary Axis | Secondary Axis |
| 1 | Reimagining Digital Commons | Governance | Trust |
| 2 | Playing to Win at AI Table | Value | Governance |
| 3 | Kouroukan Fouga Wisdom | Trust | Inclusion |
| 4 | Trust in a Broken World | Trust | Governance |
| 5 | ROI of AI Ethics | Value | Trust |
| 6 | Rise of Agentic Economy | Agency | Governance |
| 7 | Poverty & Behavioral Econ | Inclusion | Value |
| 8 | Onboarding AI in Business | Agency | Trust |
| 9 | Grow the Pie | Value | Inclusion |
| 10 | Blockchain in Government | Governance | Trust |
| 11 | Authoritarianism in Complex Age | Governance | Inclusion |
| 12 | AI Tradeoffs | Agency | Value |
| 13 | AI & Doughnut Economy | Value | Inclusion |
| 14 | Autonomous Compliance | Agency | Governance |
| 15 | It’s a Bird, It’s a Plane… | Agency | Trust |
| 16 | Leadership in Silence | Governance | Trust |
| 17 | Healing a Broken World | Trust | Inclusion |
| 18 | LEO Satellites & Climate | Value | Inclusion |
| 19 | Sustainable Investing Gens | Value | Inclusion |
| 20 | Responsible AI in Practice | Trust | Agency |
| 21 | Digital DGAIA | Governance | Trust |
| 22 | ESG Needs a Jolt | Value | Governance |
| 23 | Carbon Crisis | Value | Trust |
| 24 | Capital for Common Good | Value | Inclusion |
| 25 | Global Coalition for Governance | Governance | Inclusion |
| 26 | Bridging the AI Divide | Inclusion | Governance |
| 27 | Blockchain as Governance | Governance | Trust |
| 28 | Blockchain Digital Assets | Value | Governance |
| 29 | Beyond Neo-colonialism | Inclusion | Governance |
| 30 | AI in Latin America | Inclusion | Agency |
| 31 | AI Agents in China | Agency | Governance |
| 32 | AI Agents as Employees | Agency | Trust |
| 33 | Incentives & Verification | Trust | Value |
| 34 | Robots & Humanoids | Agency | Inclusion |
| 35 | GenAI in Healthcare | Agency | Trust |
| 36 | Small is Beautiful (AI SMEs) | Inclusion | Value |
| 37 | Terms of Engagement (Roundtables) | Governance | Trust |
Orthogonal Clusters
Dominant Primary Axes
- Governance (12 papers)
- Agency (9 papers)
- Value (9 papers)
- Inclusion (5 papers)
- Trust (2 papers)
Trust appears less often as a primary axis because it is the implicit substrate of everything else.
Conclusion
This collection constitutes a coherent doctrine for the AI age:
We are not facing a technological transition.
We are facing a transition to civilizational governance.
The work positions The Digital Economist not as a thought leader in AI, blockchain, or ESG separately, but as an architect of the institutional logic that must bind them together.